Meridith Marks New Educator Award
Nomination deadline: November 30, 2018
This award, named in honour of Dr. Meridith Marks, recognizes individuals in the first
full time phase of their educational professional career who have made a significant
contribution to medical education.
Nominees must be CAME members. A CAME member must make the initial nomination.
Members currently serving on the CAME Executive, CAME Board of Directors or the CAME
Awards Committee members are not eligible for nomination. Nominations must be formally
resubmitted each year to be considered.
The CAME Awards Committee will evaluate candidates based on:
- Teaching activities (quantity, breadth, quality)
- Development or implementation of educational innovations (degree of innovation,breadth of the innovations, acting as a catalyst, etc)
- Scholarly activities in medical education (e.g., research, scientific presentations in medical education at local, provincial and national meetings)
- Impact of the candidate’s activities (e.g. local, provincial or national)
- Research activities in medical education (quantity, funds received, quality)
- Demonstration of leadership in medical education (local, provincial or national)
- Demonstration of administrative abilities and duties at the local, provincial or national or international levels.
- Scientific presentations in medical education (local, national or international meetings)
- Scientific publications in medical education
Submissions must include:
- Maximum of three letters of nomination, two from within the nominee’s institution and one external nomination that address the above criteria. (We ask that these letters illustrate as many examples from the above criteria as possible.)
- A letter of support from the person to whom the nominee reports. If this is also the person making the nomination, then an additional letter of support from a senior educational administrator or leader who is aware of the nominee’s accomplishments will be accepted.
- The nominee’s complete curriculum vitae.
Nominees are encouraged to contact their local CAME representative for support in the application process. Please note: If your service time has not been continuous please document any leaves to demonstrate that you have been in an academic position less than seven years. Similarly, if you have held academic positions at more than one institution, the total number of years can’t exceed 7 years.
In order to confirm eligibility please contact Mary Cunningham, CAME Association Manager at email@example.com
Please submit one electronic copy of the nominating documents via email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The award is presented at the CAME Annual Luncheon during the Canadian Conference on Medical Education. The recipient is awarded a commemorative plaque and a prize of $1,000.
2018 CAME Award Winner
CAME Meridith Marks New Educator Award: The 2018 Meridith Marks New Educator Award, named in honour of Dr. Meridith Marks, recognizes individuals in the first phase of their professional career who have made a significant contribution to medical education. CAME is delighted to present the 2018 Meridith Marks New Educator Award to Dr. Ryan Brydges, University of Toronto.
Ryan Brydges, Ph.D.
Recently, Ryan was awarded the Professorship in Technology-Enabled Education at St. Michael’s Hospital (SMH) and the University of Toronto. Concurrent with that new appointment, Ryan is now the Research Director & Scientist at the Allan Waters Family Simulation Centre, SMH. In addition to his roles at SMH, Ryan is an Education Scientist at the Wilson Centre, University Health Network, and an Assistant Professor and Education Scientist in the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto. Ryan earned his PhD at the University of Toronto, and completed his post-doctoral fellowship with the Centre for Health Education Scholarship at the University of British Columbia. He translates his training from the disciplines of Kinesiology and Neuroscience to enhance his research study designs.
Ryan conducts research in three related domains: (i) clarifying how healthcare trainees and professionals manage (through self-regulation) their life-long learning, (ii) understanding how to optimize the instructional design of healthcare simulation (and other technology-enhanced learning modalities) for training and assessment of healthcare professionals (iii) identifying best practices in the training and assessment for bedside invasive medical procedures (e.g., lumbar puncture, central line insertion, thoracentesis). Examples of questions he asks include how trainees prepare for future learning, how they learn to self-monitor effectively (i.e., think about their own thinking), how educators and trainees differ in their conceptions of learning, how validity evidence is collected and organized in assessment of health professionals, and how to design training using educational technologies (e.g., iPad apps, web-based simulators) to enhance learning outcomes.
Ryan teaches in local, regional, national, and international settings, with learners from all stages of training (i.e., undergraduate to graduate students to continuing professional development). For example, he is a part of the ‘aster faculty’ of two courses offered by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Practice, Performance, & Innovation Unit. He also serves as an Associate Editor for the journal Advances in Health Sciences Education, and a Senior Editor for the journal Advances in Simulation.
Dr. Meredith Young, PhD
Meredith Young is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Medicine and a Research Scientist at the Centre for Medical Education at McGill University. She obtained her PhD from McMaster University in Psychology in 2009. Her research program tackles two main themes: 1) the cognitive mechanisms and understandings of clinical reasoning and 2) issues of validity in assessment in health professions education. More specifically, she studies how learners select relevant information, how they formulate hypotheses, develop treatment plans, and is interested in the development of expertise and markers for expert performance. She also investigates various conceptions of validity and validation, and how these understandings can influence assessment practices.